| SCOTS IN SCOTLAND - Robert Burns and Slavery |
| Written by Scotland.org | |
| Tuesday, 07 August 2007 | |
|
"Burns has also been described as a poet of the poor, an advocate of social and political change, and an opponent of slavery, pomposity and greed . . ." "Burns has also been described as a poet of the poor, an advocate of social and political change, and an opponent of slavery, pomposity and greed . . ." UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, 13th January 2004. Robert Burns, Scotland's national poet, is loved the world over as the bard of freedom, liberty and the common good of humankind. So in this, the run up to the 200th anniversary of the abolition of slavery, it comes as a great shock to many that he once accepted a job to help manage a slave plantation in the West Indies. What is the real story here – how could our Burns, the people's poet, look to become an instrument in what many now call 'The Black Holocaust'?
Hard Times and Difficult Choices Patrick Douglas was a doctor and friend of Burns with investments in an estate in Jamaica. This made him wealthy through the sugar which was so much in demand in Scotland (We still retain a sweet tooth today!). His brother was the resident manager and had a vacancy on the small white staff of overseers. Burns accepted the position, although some friends worried about his health in the climate, and he planned his emigration from the woes around him. But the fact that hurts is that, like all West Indian plantations, the Douglas enterprise was firmly built on black slave labour. Some commentators play the 'get-out-of-jail-free card' to RB here. He was 'only to be the bookkeeper'. It is true that the appellation sounds quite dull; but being 'bookkeeper' was as much about managing the assets as the numbers. He would have a daily interface with the truth of slavery – from assisting in purchases, through recording punishments and deaths and an ambitious young man might seek advancement by volunteering to be more 'hands-on'. Certainly, in a letter, Burns described his role as 'a poor Negro driver' which puts him more on the executive than the administrative arm. History intervened though as, in a last defiance of his enemies, he published his Poems to instant acclaim and Robert turned from the ports towards the City of Edinburgh, fame and marriage with Jean. But the worry remains: our poet had voluntarily contracted to become a manager of enslaved human beings – does this harm our view of him?
Burns and Slavery The only directly relevant poem is 'The Slave's Lament' (of 1792) which, while not in the first rank of his talent, at least reinforces our view of Burns as the friend of humanity and an enemy of injustice or oppression.
It was in sweet Senegal that my foes did me enthral,
All on that charming coast is no bitter snow and frost,
The burden I must bear, while the cruel scourge I fear, So we have a definitively Abolitionist poem, but how do we reconcile those sentiments to Burns's contract to serve the slave masters?
Injustice at home Many believed (either innocently or to hide their shame) that white serfdom and the black slavery were similar. Shortly after Burns' 1786 crisis, William Wilberforce made his first speech against the Slave trade, a call which particularly appealed to Scots and which grew into a popular Scottish movement for freedom, peaking in 1792. I think we see here the development of Robert's understanding of the iniquity of black slavery over those six years.
Injustice abroad Scots were prominent in the West Indies, representing over a third of the white Jamaican population. Advancement was possible, if you didn't focus on the morality. To make it easier, a salary of £30 a year looked quite tempting compared to an average labouring wage of £23 or the subsistence existence of a smallholder. Robert would have seen many lads leave in similar straits, only to return after a decade: weathered brown in skin, but golden in pocket. I love Burns, but he was no saint (that's both a compliment and a criticism). He is a mix of passion and pragmatism and in June 1786 he was in a right hard fix. Without reading his mind, did he see oppression and poverty in Scotland in a similar light to the oppression of Jamaica?
The Abolition Debate In terms of the active debate, Burns would have seen the slave-owners championed by people that he despised: from Richard Oswald who bought the estate of Auchencruive near Robert's farm in Ayrshire from his profits as one of the few active Scots slave traders, to the noxious James Maclehose (the feckless husband of 'Clarinda', his great Edinburgh love) – all people whom Burns reviled. On the side of emancipation stood 'Dalrymple mild' of Ayr Auld Kirk who had baptised the infant Robert Burns, Robin in 1759, William Robertson and Hugh Blair in whose Edinburgh salons he was lionised and even that hard businessman Creech, the publisher of Burns's later editions. We know which people Burns would side with in this argument. But in 1786, the position was less clear, voices were still gathering, evidence was remote and disguised; so it's not too hard to imagine a young man with no prospects, grabbing at a lifeline and venturing abroad without too many questions. Upon arrival, we can only guess at his horror as the depravity and barbarism unfolded. Thank heavens, the publication of his Poems meant that the sloop left for the Indies without Burns. I am certain that whatever the rationale for accepting the passage initially, the man who shared his fears with the mouse in the field, who consistently defied oppression and who understood 'man's inhumanity to man' could not have been complicit.
It seems too coincidental that the abolitionist's badge of the
period, with Wedgwood's iconic design of the kneeling slave, carried
the slogan: 'Am I not a man and a brother?' Or as we sing with our Burns, 'that man to man the world o'er, shall brothers be for a' that.' That is his true belief. Let it be so.
Clark McGinn Biography
Robert Burns Humanitarian Award The short-list for the 2006 Award included: the Khatib Family, from the Occupied West Bank in Israel who through a remarkable gesture of peace have formed a bridge between the warring communities in the Arab-Jewish conflict in Palestine; Jesus Tecu Osorio, the Guatemalan human rights activist who has fought tirelessly against state repression; anthropolgist Jeff Halper, Director of the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD); intrepid humanitarian aid worker and founder of the Campaign for Innocent Victims in Conflict, Marla Ruzicka, who was killed in a suicide bomb attack in Baghdad in April 2005; the Glasgow Girls from Drumchapel High School in Glasgow who have formed a pressure group to campaign for refugees rights; Helen and Tahir Hassan, founders of the charity Bridging Frontiers, to provide relief for people caught up in the earthquake that devastated Pakistan's North West Frontier Province in October 2005. Previous winners of the Burns Humanitarian Award include Sir John Sulston, the pioneer of the Human Genome Project, Yitzhak Frankenthal founder of the Parents Circle in Jerusalem, which represents bereaved families campaigning for peace in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Clive Stafford Smith, the British-born lawyer who has defended clients on death row in the southern states of the USA for over 20 years. For more details on the Humanitarian Award and the festival itself you can go to www.burnsfestival.com Acknowledgement: 'Scotland And The Abolition Of Black Slavery 1756 – 1838' by Iain Whyte (Edinburgh University Press, 2006) was helpful in the writing of this article.
Further Information:
Courtesy of Scottish Government - Scotland.org .
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|

